ABSTRACT
Problem: Several large studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 pregnant individuals are at a significant risk for severe disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The mechanisms underlying these phenomena remain to be elucidated and are the focus of our project. Although fetal and placental infection is rare, placental abnormalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with placental dysfunction in COVID-19 cases have been widely reported. In particular, placental thrombosis and lesions consistent with maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) of the placenta are common in individuals with COVID-19. Since thrombotic complications have been associated with COVID-19, it is not surprising that pregnant individuals with COVID- 19 are at risk for placental thrombosis. Method of Study: Placentas were evaluated histologically. Extracellular vesicles were isolated by serial centrifugation. Result(s): Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with these placental lesions, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (gestational hypertension and preeclampsia), small for gestational age (SGA, birthweight < 10th percentile for gestational age), and preterm birth (PTB, < 37 weeks) are significantly increased among pregnant individuals with COVID-19. Placental infection with SARSCoV- 2 is uncommon, but multiple inflammatory and metabolic factors are likely to affect the placenta, including circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from various organs that have been associated with COVID-19 pathology and disease severity.We have analyzed over 500 placentas from COVID-19 pregnancies and found marked changes in placental morphology, characterized by abnormal maternal and fetal vessels, intervillous thrombi, and fibrin deposition, even in the face of mild or asymptomatic disease. We detected increased levels of small EVs in maternal serum from COVID-19 cases compared to controls and increased levels of mitochondrial DNA in EVs from COVID-19 cases. In in vitro experiments, we found increased oxidative stress in uterine endothelial cells and primary trophoblasts. Syncytialization of trophoblast cells following exposure to EVs from pregnant COVID-19 patients was markedly reduced. RNAseq of trophoblast cells exposed to EVs from pregnant COVID-19 patients revealed disruption of multiple pathways related to mitochondria function, oxidative stress, coagulation defects, and inflammation. Timing of infection during pregnancy (first, second, and third trimester) altered EV size distribution, cargo content, and functional consequences of trophoblast EV exposure. Conclusion(s): Our studies show that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy has profound effects on placenta morphology and function. It remains to be determined what the long-term consequences are on the offspring.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Despite their rarity, there are a few worldwide reports of delivery during ECMO. Due to the overall scarcity and heterogeneity, these cases pose a challenge to the multidisciplinary team of professionals. Method(s): We present the only hitherto known case of a pregnant woman infected with SARS-COV2 that gave birth during a ECMO run. A 32-year-old woman at 38 weeks of pregnancy arrived at our hospital with a recorded history of cough and dyspnoea. A subsequent PCR test registered her as positive for SARS-COV2. Due to the aggravation of her respiratory state and insufficient improvements with mechanical ventilation, VVECMO therapy was induced with close monitoring of the status of the foetus by the obstetric and neonatal teams. Result(s): When the patient contracted pre-eclampsia at 39 weeks, the decision was taken to deliver the baby during the 8th day of ECMO. The procedure was uneventful and ECMO was maintained for more 15 days after delivery with minor occurrences, resulting in a total ECMO run time of 23 days. The patient stayed in ICU 30 days and was transferred home in day 40. The baby course was similarly uneventful. Conclusion(s): This case will be compared with other cases of delivery during ECMO with the aim of discussing peculiarities and similarities shared with other diseases.
ABSTRACT
CD4+ T Cells from Preeclamptic patients with or without a history of COVID-19 during pregnancy cause hypertension, autoantibodies and cognitive dysfunction in a pregnant rat model Objective: Preeclampsia (PE) new onset hypertension (HTN) during pregnancy, is associated with increased autoantibodies, cerebral blood flow (CBF) impaired cognitive function and memory loss. We have shown adoptive transfer of placentalCD4+T cells from PE women into athymic nude pregnant rats causesHTNand autoantibodies associated with PE.COVID-19 (CV) during pregnancy is associated with increased diagnosis of PE. However, we do not know the role of CD4+ T cells stimulated in response to CV in contributing to the PE phenotype seen patients with a Hx of CV during pregnancy. Therefore, we hypothesize that adoptive transfer of placental CD4+ T cells from patients with a CV History (Hx) during pregnancy with PE causes HTN, increased CBF and cognitive dysfunction in pregnant athymic nude recipient rats. Study Design: Placental CD4+ T cells isolated from normotensive (NP), PE, Hx of CV normotensive (CV Hx NT), and Hx of CV with PE (CV Hx+PE) at delivery. One million CD4+ T cells were injected i.p. into nude athymic rats on gestational day (GD) 12. The Barnes maze and the novel object recognition behavioral assays were used to assess cognitive function on GDs 15-19. Blood pressure (MAP) and CBF were measured by carotid catheter and laser Doppler flowmetry on GD19, respectively. A two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. Result(s):MAPincreased inCVHx+PE (111 +/- 4, n = 4) and PE recipient rats (115 +/- 2 mmHg, n = 5) compared to CV Hx NT (100 +/- 4, n = 5) and NP (99 +/- 3 mmHg, n = 4, P < .05). CV Hx+PE and PE exhibited latency with errors navigating in the Barnes maze compared to CV Hx NT and NP groups. Locomotor activity was decreased in CV Hx+PE (P < .05) compared to PE, CV Hx NT, and NP groups. CV Hx+PE and PE spent more time exploring identical objects compared to CV Hx NT and NP groups. PE and CV Hx+ PE had increased CBF compared to CV Hx NT and NP rats. Conclusion(s): Our findings indicate that pregnant recipients of CD4+ T cells from PE with or without a Hx CV during pregnancy cause HTN, increased CBF and cognitive dysfunction compared to recipients of NP or NT Hx COVID-19 CD4+ T cells.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic is a challenge for health practitioners, where there are many suspected and confirmed patients with COVID-19, including obstetric patients. Perioperative treatment of COVID-19 patients must be under applicable standards, for both patients and the medical personnel. Personal protective equipment is essential for health workers who treat patients with COVID-19 to prevent the transmission of the virus. The method of delivery ideally should be adapted to the clinical condition of the patient. At the same time, the management of anesthesia for patients with cesarean sections should also be adjusted to the patient's clinical condition by taking into consideration the availability of facilities and infrastructure that we have. Through this report, we want to show how we manage COVID-19 in obstetric cases using the available resources in a third-world country.Copyright © 2021 Bali Journal of Anesthesiology. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate adverse effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (COVAXIN) in a pregnant woman with that of a nonpregnant woman. Material(s) and Method(s): It is a prospective observational study done at Vanivilas Hospital, Bangalore Medical College & Research Institute (BMCRI) for 2 months. The sample size was 100 pregnant and 100 nonpregnant women. Telephonically, patients were followed-up, and details of the side/adverse effects were collected in a proforma after 2 and 14 days. Data collected from both groups were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Result(s): The majority of women were in the age group of <=25 years (64.0% and 36.0%, respectively) with a mean age of 25.01 +/- 3.71 years among the pregnant and 28.52 +/- 6.00 years among nonpregnant women. About 25.0% of pregnant women and 38.0% of nonpregnant women reported side effects. About 15.0% and 22.0% had taken treatment for side effects among pregnant women and nonpregnant women, respectively. Among the pregnant women, the common side effects reported were injection site pain (17) followed by fever (5), fatigue (4), and myalgia (03). Whereas among the nonpregnant women, the common side effects reported were injection site pain (28) followed by fever (6), myalgia (3), headache (2), and fatigue (1). Conclusion(s): Side effects reported following the administration of Covaxin in pregnant and nonpregnant women are fever, fatigue, injection site pain, myalgia, and headache. The proportion of side effects was not significantly different in the pregnant and nonpregnant women following Covaxin administration. Clinical significance: Covaxin is an inactivated killed vaccine against COVID-19 by Bharat Biotech. The vaccine has been recommended for pregnant women by the Government of India during corona pandemic. Studies are lacking regarding the difference in adverse events in pregnant versus nonpregnant women, after vaccine administration.Copyright © The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus is a challenge for global health systems and generates problems both in socio-economic and individual levels. Objectives: The aim of the study was the general presentation of viral pathogenesis, its transmissibility and maternal-fetal complications that occur following SARS-CoV2 virus infection that have been identified in the literature and its prevention. Results: This paper is a systematic review that includes a summary of the literature using the PubMed database with a selection of studies from January 2020 to July 2022. Many studies have reported a slightly increased severity of COVID-19 among pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women due to complications during pregnancy that resulted in miscarriages, premature births or preeclampsia. Conclusion: Therefore, further investigations are needed to elucidate how COVID-19 affects pregnant women and newborns as well as the long-term impact of SARS-CoV2 infection on women who have given birth, regardless of immunological status at birth.
ABSTRACT
Problem: Environmental stress during pregnancy has known impacts on both maternal and fetal health. In terms of theCOVID-19 pandemic, the majority of published work has focused on the impact of the infection itself, without considering the potential immune impact of pandemic related-stress.We, therefore, assessed the impact of pandemic stress, independently of SARS-CoV-2 infection, on the circulating and placental immune profiles of pregnant individuals. Method(s): Placentas from 239 patients were collected at the Sainte- Justine Hospital, Montreal, Canada. Of these, 199 patients delivered during the pandemic and were exposed to pandemic stress with (+: 79) or without (-: 120) SARS-CoV-2 infection, the latter exposed to pandemic stress only. Pre-pandemic historic controls (uncomplicated pregnancies, Ctrl: 40), were also included. Placental biopsies were collected to assess cytokine levels by ELISAs and histopathological lesions. A sub-study with 35 pre-pandemic pregnancies (unexposed) and 20 who delivered during the pandemic (exposed) was also conducted. The latter (exposed/unexposed) were all uncomplicated pregnancies. We collected maternal blood prior to delivery for immunophenotyping, and plasma/peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated. Inflammatory mediators in the plasma were quantified by ELISAs. Co-culture assays with PBMCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were performed to assess endothelial activation. Demographical/obstetrical data were obtained through chart review. Result(s): SARS-CoV-2+ patients were multiethnic (63.4%), had higher pre-pregnancyBMI (28.9 vs. 24.8 inCtrl, P<.05), and elevated preterm birth rate (16.5% vs. 5.8% in SARS-CoV-2-, P < .05 and 0.0% in Ctrl, P < .01). In the placentas, we observed an increase in the levels of IL- 1Ra (P < .05) and CRP (P < .05) in both SARS-CoV-2 groups, while IL-6 (P = .0790) and MCP-1 (P < .001) were elevated solely in SARS-CoV- 2-. These changes were predominant in placentas with inflammatory lesions on histopathological analysis. Moreover, we observed elevated CD45+ cells (P < .001) in the placentas from both SARS-CoV-2 groups versus Ctrl. Considering that the differences we observed were important in the SARS-CoV-2- group, we performed a study solely on uncomplicated pregnancies, either exposed or unexposed to pandemic stress. At the systemic level, we observed a decrease in the percentage of Th2 cells (P < .001), leading to a pro-inflammatory Th1/Th2 imbalance in exposed individuals. Decreased Treg (P < .05) and Th17 (P < .05) versus unexposed was also observed. Surprisingly, decreased levels of circulating IL-6 (P < .05), MCP-1 (P < .01), and CRP (P<.05) were seen in exposed versus unexposed individuals. Finally,we observed increased secretion of ICAM, a marker of endothelial activation, solely in endothelial cells co-cultured with PBMCs from exposed individuals. Conclusion(s): Overall, placental inflammatory profiles differed between pregnant individuals exposed to pandemic stress with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, we observed that the pandemic stress exposed group presented a systemic pro-inflammatory bias. This highlights the need to understand the differences between the effects of pandemic-related stress and the added burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection itself on maternal and fetal health. Our work also supports an association between an increased risk of hypertension/ preeclampsia and SARS-CoV-2 infection that might be driven in part by pandemic-related stress.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 infection is a contemporary global concern with serious ramifications. This disease is caused by a virus belonging to the Coronaviridae family named SARS-CoV-2. Immunologic and physiologic changes during pregnancy make pregnant women more susceptible to viral infection, especially COVID-19. Objective(s): The present study aimed to identify the clinical manifestations, radiologic findings, indications for cesarean delivery, underlying conditions, and the critical outcome of mothers and newborns regarding COVID-19 women who had cesarean sections and terminated pregnancies. Method(s): This cross-sectional study was conducted on the mortality and morbidity rates of 98 women with terminated pregnancies infected with COVID-19 at the time of their cesarean delivery. The demographic, clinical, and pregnancy data were collected from Razi Teaching Hospital between March 2020 and March 2021 and analyzed using SPSS version 24. Result(s): The mean age was 31.31 +/- 7.16, and the mean gestational age was 36.45 +/- 3.334 weeks. The most prevalent cause of cesarean section was fetal distress (28%), followed by preeclampsia and meconium aspiration. The most common symptoms were sore throat, cough, fever, nausea, diarrhea, and weakness;moreover, hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus were the most predominant underlying diseases. The mean duration for hospitalization was 5.21 +/- 4.584 days, the maternal death rate was 5.1%, and the neonatal death rate was 2%. Conclusion(s): The majority of women infected with COVID-19 had cesarean sections and terminated pregnancies in the third trimester. This highlights the need for better care and education for mothers in this period. The body mass index (BMI) level and obesity are strongly associated with COVID-19 severity. Furthermore, healthcare workers should pay more attention to underlying diseases during pregnancy.Copyright © 2023, Author(s).
ABSTRACT
A linked ecological analysis of environmental and demographic variables identified several factors, including poor air quality, outdoor light at night, and higher population density that were negatively associated with the incidence of diabetes (Diabetologia doi:10.1007/s00125-020-05087-7). A case-control study using a database of people known to have autoimmune disease raises anxiety about central nervous system inflammatory events (JAMA Neurol doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1162). A history of exposure to TNF inhibitors carried a threefold increase in risk both of demyelinating diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis, and of non-demyelinating conditions, such as encephalitis, neurosarcoidosis, and vasculitis.
ABSTRACT
Pregnancy is characterized by a delicate immune balance; therefore, infectious diseases might increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). Here, we hypothesize that pyroptosis, a unique cell death pathway mediated by the NLRP3 inflammasome, could link SARS-CoV-2 infection, inflammation, and APOs. Two blood samples were collected from 231 pregnant women at 11-13 weeks of gestation and in the perinatal period. At each time point, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and neutralizing antibody titers were measured by ELISA and microneutralization (MN) assays, respectively. Plasmatic NLRP3 was determined by ELISA. Fourteen miRNAs selected for their role in inflammation and/or pregnancy were quantified by qPCR and further investigated by miRNA-gene target analysis. NLRP3 levels were positively associated with nine circulating miRNAs, of which miR-195-5p was increased only in MN+ women (p-value = 0.017). Pre-eclampsia was associated with a decrease in miR-106a-5p (p-value = 0.050). miR-106a-5p (p-value = 0.026) and miR-210-3p (p-value = 0.035) were increased in women with gestational diabetes. Women giving birth to small for gestational age babies had lower miR-106a-5p and miR-21-5p (p-values = 0.001 and 0.036, respectively), and higher miR-155-5p levels (p-value = 0.008). We also observed that neutralizing antibodies and NLRP3 concentrations could affect the association between APOs and miRNAs. Our findings suggest for the first time a possible link between COVID-19, NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis, inflammation, and APOs. Circulating miRNAs might be suitable candidates to gain a comprehensive view of this complex interplay.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Circulating MicroRNA , MicroRNAs , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Pregnancy Outcome , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/genetics , Pyroptosis , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , MicroRNAs/metabolism , InflammationABSTRACT
Background: The pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 also caused infection in some pregnant women. Some reports say this viral infection can show symptoms of preeclampsia. Material and Methods: We analyzed 25 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection with 4 patients presenting with symptoms of preeclampsia. we performed routine blood analysis, renal function, liver function, and IHC examination to see the expression of viral proteins in the placenta. Results: we obtained 4 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR. In these 4 cases, none of the cases showed expression of the SARS-CoV-2 viral protein in the placenta, and all 4 mothers were declared dead after treatment, and 2 babies delivered out of these 4 cases died. In one case we had fetal death in pregnancy while in one case prematurity. 2 babies born to mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection with preeclampsia were born in good condition. There were no babies infected with SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion: We conclude that SAR-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women with comorbidities can lead to a poor prognosis for both mother and baby. We cannot yet conclude whether SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause preeclampsia, but SARS-CoV-2 infection can exacerbate preeclampsia symptoms.
ABSTRACT
Background: Some studies have reported that preeclampsia with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) significantly increases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome until near to three-fold over the normal pregnancy. Preeclampsia pathophysiology in theory, increases the perinatal mortality and morbidity starting from placental injury which is also believed to share the common pathway with COVID-19 infection. Major typical placental injuries for these matters could be apoptotic, necrotic, or pyroptotic. Objective: This study aimed to compare placental damage between those three conditions above in those three typical injuries. Study Design: This was an observational analytic study with cross-sectional setting. Seventy-two pregnant women admitted to hospital consecutively with diagnosis of preeclampsia with COVID-19, Preeclampsia only and COVID-19 only. Diagnosis for preeclampsia was following FIGO criteria with at least one of the severe features. COVID-19 eligible for this study was PCR test confirmative with moderate to severe clinical degree. Placenta were taken after the delivery, and parameters were quantified with immunohistochemistry test for caspase-3, caspase-1, and TNF-alpha representing apoptotic, pyroptotic, and necrotic pathway respectively. Results: Pregnancy with double complications, preeclampsia, and COVID-19, significantly has the highest placental damage on apoptotic, pyroptotic, and necrotic pathway shown from the caspase-3, caspase-1, and TNF-alpha expression in placenta (p <0.05). Moderate to severe degree of COVID-19 resulting higher placental damage compared to preeclampsia in all the three forms (p <0.05). Apoptotic process was the most prominent among other pathways. Conclusion: Preeclampsia with COVID-19 infection showed significant placental damage, with major changes related were apoptosis, inflammation, and necrosis. This data support poor perinatal outcome of pregnancy having preeclampsia and COVID-19 at the same time.
ABSTRACT
Data on the efficacy of remdesivir in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited in pregnant patients since they have been excluded from clinical trials. We aimed to investigate some clinical outcomes following remdesivir administration in pregnancy. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on pregnant women with moderate to severe COVID-19. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups with and without remdesivir treatment. The primary outcomes of this study were the length of hospital and intensive care unit stay; respiratory parameters of hospital day 7 including respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and mode of oxygen support; discharge until days 7 and 14, and need for home oxygen therapy. Secondary outcomes included some maternal and neonatal consequences. Eighty-one pregnant women (57 in the remdesivir group and 24 in the non-remdesivir group) were included. The two study groups were comparable according to the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the respiratory outcomes, remdesivir was significantly associated with a reduced length of hospital stay (p = 0.021) and also with a lower level of oxygen requirement in patients on low-flow oxygen [odds ratio (OR) 3.669]. Among the maternal consequences, no patients in the remdesivir group developed preeclampsia but three patients (12.5%) experienced this complication in the non-remdesivir group (p = 0.024). Furthermore, in patients with moderate COVID-19, the percentage of emergency termination was significantly lower in remdesivir group (OR 2.46). Our results demonstrated some probable benefits of remdesivir in respiratory and also maternal outcomes. Further investigations with a larger sample size should confirm these results.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 caused a rapid integration of telehealth into prenatal care. This raises questions about the ability to screen for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy when caring for patients remotely. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of telehealth adaptation on the timing and severity of diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy who delivered from April 2019 to October 2019 (before the pandemic) and April 2020 to October 2020 (during the pandemic) at 1 urban tertiary care center. The primary outcome was mean gestational age at diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. The secondary outcomes included severity of diagnosis, both initially and at the time of delivery. The results were adjusted for baseline characteristic difference at P<.10, using multivariable logistic regression and analysis of covariance, as appropriate. The sample size was calculated based on a previous cohort study of patients who developed preeclampsia, with a mean gestational age at delivery of 36.3 weeks and a standard deviation of 2.8 weeks. A sample size of 124 patients would be needed per group to detect a gestational age difference of 1 week with 80% power and a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Overall, 498 patients were included, with 231 from 2019 and 267 from 2020. Of note, 17.1% of patients had preeclampsia with severe features initially, and 29.3% of patients met the criteria at delivery. In 2020, 80.5% of patients used telehealth (vs 0.9% of patients in 2019), doing so for a mean of 29.0% of prenatal appointments. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses showed no significant difference in gestational age at diagnosis or diagnosis severity between cohorts. In the adjusted analysis, cohort year was not significantly associated with severity of initial diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.39; P=.53) or severity of diagnosis at delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.46; P=.87). However, Black race was significantly associated with increased risk of having severe preeclampsia at initial diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.85; P=.046). In addition, Black race (adjusted odds ratio, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-4.28; P<.001), Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio for non-Hispanic, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.82; P=.01), and initial body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06; P=.005) were significantly associated with a diagnosis of severe preeclampsia at delivery. CONCLUSION: The adaptation of telehealth was not associated with delays in the diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or with increased severity of diagnoses.
ABSTRACT
Advances in biology have allowed us to substantially deepen our knowledge about hemostasis functioning both in health and disease. ADAMTS-13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) are components of the hemostasis system, which physiological interaction holds an important place in maintaining homeostasis. ADAMTS-13 is a metalloproteinase mainly acting to release vWF fragments into the blood plasma, as well as regulating its activity by cleaving ultra-large vWF multimers (UL-vWF) into smaller and less active forms. The study of such factors is of great clinical importance, since a decrease in ADAMTS-13 activity and an increase in vWF level can be predictors of microcirculatory disorders that play an important role in developing multiple organ failure. However, very few and fully contradictory studies devoted to the physiological aspects of the ADAMTS-13/vWF axis functioning in the mother-fetus system are available, therefore requiring to be further investigated.Copyright © 2023 Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 in pregnancy can increase the risk of complications due to the cardiorespiratory and immunological changes typical of pregnancy. Objective: To report the epidemiological characterization of COVID-19 in Mexican pregnant women. Material and methods: Cohort study on pregnant women with a positive COVID-19 test, which were followed until delivery and one month later. Results: 758 pregnant women were included in the analysis. Mothers' mean age was 28.8 +/- 6.1 years;the majority were workers 497 (65.6%) and with an urban origin (482, 63.6%);the most common blood group was O with 458 (63.0%);478 (63.0%) were nulliparous women and more than 25% had some comorbidities;the average gestation weeks at infection were 34.4 +/- 5.1 weeks;only 170 pregnant women (22.4%) received vaccination;the most frequent vaccine was BioNTech Pfizer (96, 60%);there were no serious adverse events attributed to vaccination. The mean gestational age at delivery was 35.4 +/- 5.2 weeks;85% of pregnancies were cesarean section;the most frequent complication was prematurity (406, 53.5%), followed by preeclampsia (199, 26.2%);there were 5 cases of maternal death and 39 cases of perinatal death. Conclusions: COVID-19 in pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth, preeclampsia, and maternal death. Vaccination against COVID-19 in this series showed no risk for pregnant women and their newborns. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
Intro: COVID-19 pandemic era makes quality of obstetric triage care including caesarean section in obstetric true emergency cases delayed. Maternal fetal triage index (MFTI) score is an instrument used to define true emergency in obstetric cases. Decision to delivery interval (DDI) is time interval from caesarean section decision to delivery within <30 minutes standard in emergency cases.This study was designed to evaluate the decision to delivery time interval and its effect on perinatal outcomes and the associated factors during category-1 emergency caesarean section deliveries. Method(s): A prospective observational descriptive study was conducted from 2020-2022 at Kariadi tertiary Hospital. A total of 40 clients who were undergone category-1 emergency caesarean section were included in this study. This is a indepht analysis pregnant women confirmed with COVID-19 infection and had true emergency cases based on MFTI score (stat-priority 1). Finding(s): Among 346 pregnant women with COVID-19, total 160 C-section cases with 40 eligible data were included in this study. Gestational age mostly in their second and third trimester. Maternal comorbidities were diabetes in pregnancy, HIV, pre eclampsia, SLE and thyroid disease. This study showed that DDI <30 minutes were found in 34 cases (85%), DDI 30-60 minutes as many as 6 (15%), and no (0%) DDI >60 minutes. Emergency cases with the shortest DDI were umbilical cord prolapse 3 (100%), fetal distress 14 (93%), placental abruption 5 (83%), impending uterine rupture 5 (83%), and antepartum hemorrhage 7 (70%). Perinatal outcome were Apgar score lower than 7 at 1 minutes (25%) and stillbirth (5%). Conclusion(s): Most of DDI in this study met the recommendation of <30 minutes, but some cases did not meet the standard. This can be caused by multifactorial factors such as advice from the doctor in charge, patient transfer distance, operating room preparation, and anesthetic preparation due to COVID-19.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pregnant women at high risk for developing a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy require frequent antenatal assessments, especially of their blood pressure. This expends significant resources for both the patient and healthcare system. An alternative to in-clinic assessments is a remote blood pressure monitoring strategy, in which patients self-record their blood pressure at home using a validated blood pressure machine. This has the potential to be cost-effective, increase patient satisfaction, and reduce outpatient visits, and has had widespread uptake recently given the increased need for remote care during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However robust evidence supporting this approach over a traditional face-to-face approach is lacking, and the impact on maternal and foetal outcomes has not yet been reported. Thus, there is an urgent need to assess the efficacy of remote monitoring in pregnant women at high risk of developing a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. METHODS: The REMOTE CONTROL trial is a pragmatic, unblinded, randomised controlled trial, which aims to compare remote blood pressure monitoring in high-risk pregnant women with conventional face-to-face clinic monitoring, in a 1:1 allocation ratio. The study will recruit patients across 3 metropolitan Australian teaching hospitals and will evaluate the safety, cost-effectiveness, impact on healthcare utilisation and end-user satisfaction of remote blood pressure monitoring. DISCUSSION: Remote blood pressure monitoring is garnering interest worldwide and has been increasingly implemented following the COVID-19 pandemic. However, robust data regarding its safety for maternofoetal outcomes is lacking. The REMOTE CONTROL trial is amongst the first randomised controlled trials currently underway, powered to evaluate maternal and foetal outcomes. If proven to be as safe as conventional clinic monitoring, major potential benefits include reducing clinic visits, waiting times, travel costs, and improving delivery of care to vulnerable populations in rural and remote communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620001049965p, on October 11th, 2020).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy, High-Risk , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Blood Pressure , Pandemics/prevention & control , Australia , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has been reported to increase the risk of prematurity, however, due to the frequent absence of unaffected controls as well as inadequate accounting for confounders in many studies, the question requires further investigation. We sought to determine the impact of COVID-19 disease on preterm birth (PTB) overall, as well as related subcategories such as early prematurity, spontaneous, medically indicated preterm birth, and preterm labor (PTL). We assessed the impact of confounders such as COVID-19 risk factors, a-priori risk factors for PTB, symptomatology, and disease severity on rates of prematurity. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women from March 2020 till October 1st, 2020. The study included patients from 14 obstetric centers in Michigan, USA. Cases were defined as women diagnosed with COVID-19 at any point during their pregnancy. Cases were matched with uninfected women who delivered in the same unit, within 30 d of the delivery of the index case. Outcomes of interest were frequencies of prematurity overall and subcategories of preterm birth (early, spontaneous/medically indicated, preterm labor, and premature preterm rupture of membranes) in cases compared to controls. The impact of modifiers of these outcomes was documented with extensive control for potential confounders. A p value <.05 was used to infer significance. RESULTS: The rate of prematurity was 8.9% in controls, 9.4% in asymptomatic cases, 26.5% in symptomatic COVID-19 cases, and 58.8% among cases admitted to the ICU. Gestational age at delivery was noted to decrease with disease severity. Cases were at an increased risk of prematurity overall [adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 1.62 (1.2-2.18)] and of early prematurity (<34 weeks) [aRR = 1.8 (1.02-3.16)] when compared to controls. Medically indicated prematurity related to preeclampsia [aRR = 2.46 (1.47-4.12)] or other indications [aRR = 2.32 (1.12-4.79)], were the primary drivers of overall prematurity risk. Symptomatic cases were at an increased risk of preterm labor [aRR = 1.74 (1.04-2.8)] and spontaneous preterm birth due to premature preterm rupture of membranes [aRR = 2.2(1.05-4.55)] when compared to controls and asymptomatic cases combined. The gestational age at delivery followed a dose-response relation with disease severity, as more severe cases tended to deliver earlier (Wilcoxon p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is an independent risk factor for preterm birth. The increased preterm birth rate in COVID-19 was primarily driven by medically indicated delivery, with preeclampsia as the principal risk factor. Symptomatic status and disease severity were significant drivers of preterm birth.